Sometimes when I need a good laugh, I go see this guy's journal: http://www.livejournal.com/users/neo_is
It doesnt really take long, when you enter the site from you can already tell that this guy is the kind of person that only talks cause he likes the sound of his own voice. He thinks whatever he says is important because it sounds politically aware, thus he's no ordinary punk, he's the new breed of smart punk. The kind that never has anything good to say, and everyday tries to find something to complain about. What he fails to realize is that he's just a little kid, maybe obsessed with bad religion and wants to have somewhat of a say in political issues even though he might be wrong. However cute this may be, it does not make him john stewart.
Here's an example

Here's the issues.
"Who gives a Shit"- Parents and people who dont want their kids watching video game sex.
5- "You cannot unlock the sex with ingame codes"- You're a tard, that's not the issue with the game. On top of the already too much excessive violence and highly sexual themes people now manipulate it to be even worse. I dont see anyone hacking away at, lets say, super mario brothers.

4- "This game is mature 17+"- Well, that meant you passed the reading test. Meaning, you can read this, which is good. While games do have ratings on them, just 2 years ago was there a state who actually put up a bill enforcing it. Basically these are the only ratings that are just guidelines. Any 11 year old kid could go to best buy and get a copy. And you should know how kids are, they dont give a fuck about this "barrier" of a rating system.
3- "You can download the hack from the Internet!!"- Oh shit, really? I guess its alright then. Lol, and half the intelligence to "track down a patch file". I'm gonna go out and buy some porn mags to hand off at the kids in the street, since it's so easy for them to get it anyway.
2- "So I downloaded a video of this supposed sex scene. Then I watched it."- While the guy may be in his pants..and you seem to get all giddy finding that out and get to say what we all love to say, magic penis, it's a sex scene, they're not concerned with what kind of sex it is, or what sexual position, or if the video game has a bad engine that makes penises invisible. It's sex, period.
1-"there are sexually deprived losers in delaware." (overdone insertion of some random picture popular in forums and the like for the humor uproar it seems to cause).-You should be there.
EDIT
Something that I didnt catch and was just recent news.
http://www.betanews.com/article/RockSta
Blaming the people who find this stuff is like blaming a kid for breaking his dad's safe to find his dad's porn stash. It really shouldnt've been there in the first place.
July 21 2005, 20:01:27 UTC 6 years ago
In a sense, it actually is. Going after Rockstar for this is sort of like going against a director for sex that he filmed in a scene that never made it to the theatrical print but somehow got out on the Internet.
And people do make Mario Bros hacks. For example, "Super KKK Brothers" (I wish I was making it up)
Any 11 year old kid could go to best buy and get a copy. And you should know how kids are, they dont give a fuck about this "barrier" of a rating system.
Fair enough, but if so, that's the fault of Best Buy, not Rockstar or GTA.
Oh shit, really? I guess its alright then. Lol, and half the intelligence to "track down a patch file". I'm gonna go out and buy some porn mags to hand off at the kids in the street, since it's so easy for them to get it anyway.
I agree with him here, too. If a kid can download GTA mods then he can just as easily find porn on the Internet. It has nothing to do with buying kids porn mags, it has to do with the fact that you can't just "stumble" across the sex scenes in the game, they have to be "unlocked" with a third party program that modifies files in the game. If a kid can find that, he can find nude pictures of women.
July 21 2005, 20:09:27 UTC 6 years ago
GTA has sex without the mods.., Why is it there in the first place for it to be "unlocked".
There was a problem with the game before the mod. Now just more people are noticing it because of this.
"In a sense, it actually is. Going after Rockstar for this is sort of like going against a director for sex that he filmed in a scene that never made it to the theatrical print but somehow got out on the Internet."
I'm not sure I follow on that one. There was sex before the mod..every women in town is a hooker.
A better comparison would be, going after a director that made a sex scene, but in the theatrical print people added a few more money shots.
July 21 2005, 20:38:19 UTC 6 years ago
There was sex before the mod..every women in town is a hooker.
There are hookers, but most of the female characters are not hookers.
A better comparison would be, going after a director that made a sex scene, but in the theatrical print people added a few more money shots.
No, because in my example, there was a sex scene that was removed from the final cut, which is what Rockstar did in the case of the stuff that "Hot Coffee" mods.
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
July 21 2005, 22:57:01 UTC 6 years ago
July 21 2005, 22:58:02 UTC 6 years ago
6 years ago
July 21 2005, 22:59:18 UTC 6 years ago
July 21 2005, 20:34:45 UTC 6 years ago
July 21 2005, 20:35:45 UTC 6 years ago
July 21 2005, 20:46:58 UTC 6 years ago
July 21 2005, 21:36:59 UTC 6 years ago
Rockstar have fucked up. End of story.
They applied for the M rating for their game when they should've applied for the AO rating instead. But because MOST retailers won't even stock and shelf AO games, they found that they were in a bit of a fix as of course they want to sell their games to as many people as possible. Now that some codes/hack (NOT A MOD!) have surfaced about revealing some graphic sex scenes that were left out of the inital game but left there as an easter egg for fans to find, they should be rightly bollocked for decieving the certificate board just so they could make some more moolah.
July 21 2005, 21:45:22 UTC 6 years ago
July 21 2005, 21:49:08 UTC 6 years ago
July 21 2005, 21:54:17 UTC 6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
July 21 2005, 21:57:29 UTC 6 years ago
However if this guy has actually PROGRAMMED something that you have to download and install and run alongsise with GTA to make this happen (intentionally, he programmed the game to do that.) then it's a mod and it wouldn't be Rockstar's fault.
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
July 21 2005, 21:54:26 UTC 6 years ago
July 21 2005, 21:59:26 UTC 6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
July 21 2005, 21:46:42 UTC 6 years ago
July 21 2005, 21:47:53 UTC 6 years ago
July 21 2005, 21:57:12 UTC 6 years ago
This sort of stuff goes on in the software industry all the time. You can try to blame Rockstar as a company, as though they're some hive mind entity, all on the same page, all conspiring together. Or you can face the reality that this was one level developer trying to get an easter egg into the product to brag to his/her friends about.
If you're going to blame Rockstar for something, blame them for the tasteless game that management actually signed off on.
July 21 2005, 23:08:54 UTC 6 years ago
July 21 2005, 23:10:35 UTC 6 years ago
July 21 2005, 23:14:29 UTC 6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
6 years ago
July 21 2005, 23:26:46 UTC 6 years ago
July 22 2005, 18:29:45 UTC 6 years ago
(if you didn't catch the below post..)
She's completly naked, the only person who isn't naked is the main character, he's fully clothed but she ain't wearing a thing.
The scene is around 2 to 3 minutes long,
There full nudity of the woman,
There's descriptive pornography-type moaning and groaning and "how do you like that, huh?" talk coming from the guy.
She goes down on him and gives him head.
He shags her in a few positions on the bed as the camera pans in and zooms in on the couple for the rest of the scene.
6 years ago
July 22 2005, 18:44:33 UTC 6 years ago